This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by VELDHUIS, J. D. Articles by ROGOL, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by VELDHUIS, J. D. Articles by ROGOL, A. D.

Physiological Properties of the Luteinizing Hormone Pulse Signal: Impact of Intensive and Extended Venous Sampling Paradigms on Its Characterization in Healthy Men and Women^*

Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Medical School Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Pharmacology, University of Virginia Medical School Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Pathology, University of Virginia Medical School Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Pediatrics, University of Virginia Medical School Charlottesville, Virginia 22908

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Johannes D. Veldhuis, Box 202, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908.

The pulsatile nature of the gonadotropin signal is a critical determinant of physiological activation of the gonadal axis. Nonetheless, major uncertainties exist regarding the exact patterns of LH secretion that constitute normal physiological profiles in man. To assess possible bases for the discrepancies in the literature, we sampled blood at 5-min intervals for 24 h in eight normal men and eight normal women in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. The constituent 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-min immunoactive LH series and the consituent 6-, 12-, or 24-h sampling durations provided ranges of sampling intensities and durations for analysis of significant LH pulses. A technique for minimizing the influence of false positive immunoassay errors on peak detection was used to aid in estimating apparent true positive LH pulse frequency.

Nonlinear curve fitting of the relationship between sampling intensity and apparent true positive LH pulse frequency revealed a stable pulse frequency estimate at intensive rates of venous sampling, with values of 19.5 ± 1.9 (±SEM) pulses/24 h (periodicity, 73.8 ± 6.5 min/pulse) in men and 20.6 ± 3.6 pulses/24 h (periodicity, 70.0 ± 10 min/pulse) in women. Further analyses indicated that sampling every 3.1 and 2.0 min for 24 h would be required to capture 90% of the LH pulses in men and women, respectively. Moreover, even with a 5-min sampling rate, the statistical counting errors of the LH pulse frequency estimates varied markedly with sampling duration; for example, in men sampled in 6-, 12-, and 24-hr sessions, the values were, respectively, 49%, 35%, and 24% of the observed pulse frequencies. Similar variations were found in women. Counting errors were 30–50% higher for conventional 20-min sampling rates than for 5-min sampling intervals.

Measured interpulse intervals varied widely from 10–330 min (median, 60 min; n = 131 LH pulses) in men and from 10–340 min (median, 65 min; n = 125 LH pulses) in women. In addition, absolute LH pulse amplitudes varied from 1–28 mlU/ml (median, 4.1 mlU/ml) in men and from 1–24 mlU/ml (median, 3.6 mlU/ml) in women. These estimates were associated with a median number of points identified within each pulse of 6.0 in men and 4.0 in women.

In summary, the present exhaustive sampling studies demonstrate for the first time stable estimates of physiological LH pulsations in normal men and women, and document broad ranges of normal LH pulse amplitudes and interpulse intervals. We conclude that both intensive and prolonged sampling conditions are necessary to define stable and precise estimates of physiological LH pulse patterns and to disclose the physiological ranges of these properties in normal individuals.

^* This work was supported by the following NIH-sponsored resources: Research Career Development Award 1K04-00634, Biomedical Research Support Award 5S07-RR-05431, a University of Virginia Computer Services grant, and NIDA Grant R03-DA-03315 (to J.D.V.); NICHHD Clinical Investigator Award 1-K03-HD00439 (to W.S.E.); NIH Grants AM-22125, AM-30302, and GM-28928 (to M.L.J.); University of Virginia Research and Development Grant 6-40047 to (A.D.R.); USPHS General Clinical Research Grant RR-847; and Diabetes Research and Training Center Grant 5-P60-AM-21125-05.

Received September 13, 1985.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, and S. M. Pincus Motivations and Methods for Analyzing Pulsatile Hormone Secretion Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2008; 29(7): 823 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Hayes, N. Pitteloud, S. DeCruz, W. F. Crowley Jr., and P. A. Boepple Importance of Inhibin B in the Regulation of FSH Secretion in the Human Male J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2001; 86(11): 5541 - 5546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Preponderance of Basic Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Isoforms Accompanies Inappropriate Hypersecretion of Both Basal and Pulsatile LH in Adolescents with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4629 - 4636. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. B. Seminara, F. J. Hayes, and W. F. Crowley Jr. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Deficiency in the Human (Idiopathic Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism and Kallmann's Syndrome): Pathophysiological and Genetic Considerations Endocr. Rev., October 1, 1998; 19(5): 521 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. A. Clark, A. Iranmanesh, J. D. Veldhuis, and A. D. Rogol Comparison of Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone Secretion Between Prepubertal Children and Young Adults: Evidence for a Mass/Amplitude-Dependent Difference Without Gender or Day/Night Contrasts J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1997; 82(9): 2950 - 2955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]