help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Puyol, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hernando, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Puyol, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hernando, L.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 62, 352-356, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Molecular heterogeneity of circulating prolactin in chronic uremic men and renal transplant recipients

D Rodriguez-Puyol, JE Martin-Oar, MV Cachofeiro, D del Pino, JM Lopez-Novoa and L Hernando

Serum PRL levels and its molecular heterogeneity were analyzed, basally and after 500 micrograms TRH given acutely, in four groups of men: normal (C, n = 12), chronic renal failure (CRF, n = 11), hemodialysis (HD, n = 12), and transplant recipients (T, n = 11). The mean basal PRL level was higher in group CRF than in group C and even higher in group HD. The basal hyperprolactinemia was due to increased concentrations of little PRL. The absolute levels of total and little PRL 20 min after TRH were comparable in the four groups. The disappearance index (DI = PRL20-PRL120/PRL20) for total and little PRL was lower in CRF than in C and even lower in HD. A positive correlation was found between the DIs of total and little PRL and creatinine clearance in group CRF. Group T had basal and 20 min serum PRL levels and a pattern of molecular distribution similar to those of group C but total and little PRL DI was lower. These results demonstrate that uremic hyperprolactinemia is due to increases in little PRL without major changes in big and big-big forms of PRL. The reduction of glomerular filtration rate seems to be one of the most important mechanisms responsible for little PRL accumulation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society