help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoemaker, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoemaker, J.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 61, 859-867, Copyright © 1985 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Prolonged pulsatile administration of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in prepubertal children: diagnostic and physiologic aspects

HA Delemarre-van de Waal, JL Van den Brande and J Schoemaker

In order to test gonadotropic function 30 prepubertal and 2 early pubertal girls and boys were treated with LH-releasing hormone (LRH) in a pulsatile fashion for 7 days. LRH was administered iv either in a dose of 10 micrograms every 90 min or in a dose of 20 micrograms/1.73 m2 every 96 min. On days 1 and 7, just before as well as at the end of LRH treatment, a LRH test (100 micrograms/m2 iv) was performed. In 27 patients a LRH test was repeated 4 (day 11) or 7 days (day 14) after LRH withdrawal as well. Plasma LH, FSH, and estradiol or testosterone levels were estimated during the LRH tests on days 1, 7, and 11/14. The patients were divided into 4 groups: group 1 consisted of 2 girls and 1 boy with gonadal failure, group 2 of 1 girl and 2 boys with intact pituitary and gonadal function, group 3 of 11 girls and 13 boys with various central endocrine disorders, and group 4 of 1 girl and 1 boy with pubertal arrest of unknown origin. In group 1 LRH treatment elicited an increase of both gonadotropins into the castrate range, whereas gonadal steroids did not increase. In group 2 baseline LH as well as the response to LRH increased on day 7. In the boys FSH changed similarly. In the girl baseline FSH increased, but the high FSH response of day 1 decreased. Estradiol and testosterone levels were elevated on day 7. These changes during LRH treatment are similar to those during normal pubertal development. When the LRH test was repeated on day 11/14 basal levels had returned into the prepubertal range and a high response of LH especially was found in all 3 subjects. Patients of group 3 were separated into two subgroups: group 3a, those with, and group 3b, those without an increase of gonadal steroids on day 7 of LRH treatment. Since an increment must be the result of increased gonadotropin stimulation, this probably indicates intact gonadotropic function. Group 3a had a pattern of gonadotropin secretion similar to group 2. In group 3b basal and peak LH levels were lower on day 7 compared to group 3a, whereas FSH levels did not differ. Four or 7 days after LRH discontinuation (day 11/14) basal gonadotropin levels were in the original low range. In the LRH test mean LH peak level of group 3a was 43.7 U/liter, of group 3b 13.1 U/liter (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1985 by The Endocrine Society