help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garvey, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Olefsky, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garvey, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Olefsky, J. M.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 60, 559-568, Copyright © 1985 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Modulation of insulin secretion by insulin and glucose in type II diabetes mellitus

WT Garvey, RR Revers, OG Kolterman, AH Rubenstein and JM Olefsky

We studied the dose-response characteristics of insulin's ability to modulate its own secretion in normal and type II diabetic (NIDDM) subjects by measuring suppression of serum C-peptide levels during insulin infusions with the plasma glucose level held constant. In normal subjects at euglycemia, primed continuous insulin infusion rates of 15, 40, 120, and 240 mU/M2 X min acutely raised serum insulin to steady state levels of 37 +/- 2 (+/- SE), 96 +/- 6, 286 +/- 17, and 871 +/- 93 microU/ml, respectively. During each infusion, maximal suppression of C-peptide to 30% of basal levels occurred by 130 min. At the higher insulin levels (greater than or equal to 100 microU/ml), C- peptide levels fell rapidly, with an apparent t1/2 of 13 min, which approximates estimates for the t1/2 of circulating C-peptide in man. This is consistent with an immediate 70% inhibition of the basal rate of insulin secretion. At the lower insulin level (37 +/- 2 microU/ml), C-peptide levels fell to 30% of basal values less rapidly (apparent t1/2, 33 min), suggesting that 70% inhibition of basal insulin secretion rates was achieved more slowly. In NIDDM subjects, primed continuous insulin infusion rates of 15, 40, 120, and 1200 mU/M2 X min acutely raised serum insulin to steady state levels of 49 +/- 7, 93 +/- 11,364 +/- 31, and 10,003 +/- 988 microU/ml. During studies at basal hyperglycemia, only minimal C-peptide suppression was found, even at pharmacological insulin levels (10,003 +/- 988 microU/ml). However, if plasma glucose was allowed to fall during the insulin infusions, there was a rapid decrease in serum C-peptide to 30% of basal levels, analogous to that in normal subjects. Three weeks of intensive insulin therapy did not alter C-peptide suppression under conditions of hyperinsulinemia and falling plasma glucose. The following conclusions were reached. 1) In normal subjects, insulin (40-1000 microU/ml) inhibits its own secretion in a dose-responsive manner; more time is required to achieve maximal 70% suppression at the lower insulin level (40 microU/ml). 2) In NIDDM studied at basal hyperglycemia, insulin has minimal ability to suppress its own secretion. Thus, impaired feedback inhibition could contribute to basal hyperinsulinemia. 3) Under conditions of hyperinsulinemia and falling plasma glucose, insulin secretion is rapidly suppressed in NIDDM (analogous to that in normal subjects studied during euglycemia.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1985 by The Endocrine Society