help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiodini, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Verde, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiodini, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Verde, G. G.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 60, 48-52, Copyright © 1985 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Changes in growth hormone (GH) secretion induced by human pancreatic GH releasing hormone-44 in acromegaly: a comparison with thyrotropin- releasing hormone and bromocriptine

PG Chiodini, A Liuzzi, D Dallabonzana, G Oppizzi and GG Verde

We studied the effects of 100 micrograms human pancreatic GH releasing hormone-44 (GRH) in 35 acromegalic patients. Plasma GH levels significantly increased [basal, 30 +/- 10 (SE) ng/ml; peak, 82 +/- 21 ng/ml; P less than 0.01], but a wide intersubject variability of the responses was found (range, 20-1602%). No relationship was found between the percentage GH increase after GRH and basal values of GH, PRL, or somatomedin-C. All patients also underwent an acute test with bromocriptine (2.5 mg orally) and TRH (200 micrograms iv). When dividing the patients according to their GH responsiveness to bromocriptine (Br), an inverse correlation (r = -0.42, P less than 0.05) was found between percentage of GH changes after GRH and after Br; moreover Br responder patients had a lesser (P less than 0.001) GH increase after GRH (124 +/- 27%) than nonresponders (562 +/- 116%). No relationship was found between the GH response to TRH and GRH, and no differences were found between the percentage GH increase after TRH (513 +/- 117%) and after GRH (349 +/- 71%). We conclude that the tumoral somatotrophs are sensitive to their specific releasing hormone and we suggest that the presence in the adenoma of cells with surface membrane receptors similar to those on the lactotropes may explain the lower sensitivity to GRH of Br responders compared to nonresponders.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1985 by The Endocrine Society