help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, G. B., Jr

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 59, 1159-1163, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

A comparison of two methods for detecting hormone peaks: the effect of sampling interval on gonadotropin peak frequency

JL Ross, KM Barnes, S Brody, GR Merriam, DL Loriaux and GB Cutler Jr

There is no consensus on the optimum method to identify gonadotropin pulses in serum. We compared two approaches for detecting gonadotropin peaks. The first employed the conventional criterion of an increment from nadir to peak of 3 times the intraassay coefficient of variation (3 CV). The second identified peaks by Student's t test to quadruplicate measurements at each time point. We obtained blood samples every 5 min for 6 h from four women in the follicular phase. We also constructed control or noise series by subdividing single serum pools into consecutively labeled aliquots. Any variations in hormone concentration in the noise series that were identified as peaks were, by definition, false positive peaks. We evaluated the effect of sampling interval on gonadotropin peak detection by omitting data to simulate sampling every 10, 15, or 20 min. The 3 CV approach identified numerous false positive peaks in the noise series and detected as many peaks in the noise series as it did in the patient series. Increasing the sampling frequency from every 20 to every 5 min nearly doubled the apparent peak frequencies in both the patient and the noise series (P less than 0.025). By contrast, the t test method detected far fewer false positive peaks and significantly more peaks in the patient series than in the noise series. Increasing the sampling frequency from every 20 to every 5 min resulted in a 50-75% increase in peak frequency by the t test method. This increase in peak frequency appeared to result from improved detection of small peaks, because samples were obtained nearer the true peaks and nadirs. The resulting increase in the nadir to peak increment made it more likely that a small peak would achieve statistical significance. We conclude that increasingly stringent criteria for pulse detection should be applied as one increase the sampling frequency, and that the t test approach is a more valid method than the 3 CV approach because it yields significantly fewer false positive peaks.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. S. Medan, G. Watanabe, K. Sasaki, S. Sharawy, N. P. Groome, and K. Taya
Ovarian Dynamics and Their Associations with Peripheral Concentrations of Gonadotropins, Ovarian Steroids, and Inhibin During the Estrous Cycle in Goats
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 57 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
E. C. Chen, M. H. Samuels, M. F. Luther, T. S. King, C. A. Eddy, T. M. Siler-Khodr, and R. S. Schenken
Cocaine Impairs Follicular Phase Pulsatile Gonadotropin Secretion in Rhesus Monkeys
Reproductive Sciences, November 1, 1998; 5(6): 311 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society