help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stouffer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Christian, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stouffer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Christian, C. D.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 58, 1027-1033, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Follicular fluid treatment during the follicular versus luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: effects on corpus luteum function

RL Stouffer, GD Hodgen, AC Ottobre and CD Christian

Administration of charcoal-extracted porcine follicular fluid (pFF) to rhesus monkeys at the time of menses impairs the subsequent function of the corpus luteum of the menstrual cycle. The following studies were performed: 1) to characterize the luteal phase defect induced by pFF treatment at menses, and 2) to determine whether pFF treatment in the luteal phase alters corpus luteum function. Adult, female rhesus monkeys were injected sc for 3 days with pFF (10, 5, and 5 ml) beginning on day 1 (n = 5) or day 18 (n = 4) of the menstrual cycle. Femoral venous blood was collected daily throughout the treatment cycle and during the posttreatment cycle of day 18 to 20-treated monkeys. Serum LH, FSH, 17 beta-estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P) were measured by RIA. After pFF treatment on days 1-3, FSH and E2 levels in the early follicular phase were less (P less than 0.05) than those of control cycles (n = 7). Serum LH was not suppressed by pFF treatment. Moreover, the preovulatory rise in circulating E2 and the amplitude of the LH/FSH surge were similar in control and pFF-treated monkeys. Although timely midcycle gonadotropin surges occurred in four of five pFF-treated monkeys, serum P was markedly reduced (P less than 0.05) during the first half of the luteal phase. Circulating P increased to control levels during the late luteal phase before normal onset of menses 16.3 +/- 1.0 (SE) days after the LH surge. Treatment with pFF on days 18-20 of the cycle reduced the levels of circulating FSH, but serum LH, E2, P, and the length of the luteal phase remained comparable to control cycles. Moreover, the hormonal patterns and the length of the follicular and luteal phases in the posttreatment cycle indicated normal ovarian function. Thus, pFF treatment at menses results in an aberrant ovarian cycle characterized by an insufficient, rather than short, luteal phase. Whereas pFF treatment in the early follicular phase vitiates development of the dominant follicle and the related corpus luteum, similar treatment at midluteal phase does not suppress concurrent luteal function or subsequent folliculogenesis.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society