help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendler, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sherwin, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hendler, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sherwin, R. S.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 58, 1014-1021, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Epinephrine-stimulated glucose production is not diminished by starvation: evidence for an effect on gluconeogenesis

RG Hendler and RS Sherwin

We infused physiological doses of epinephrine (1.2 microgram/m2 X min) into six healthy obese subjects in the postabsorptive state and after 3- 4 days of starvation. During starvation, a reduction in hepatic glycogen stores was demonstrated by the absence of a rise in plasma glucose and glucose production (using [3-3H]glucose) in response to glucagon infusion. The increases in plasma epinephrine and glucose during the epinephrine infusion were comparable before and after starvation. Most importantly, the increase in endogenous glucose production produced by epinephrine was virtually unaffected, i.e. the initial rise in glucose production (59% vs. 49%), the incremental area under the curve (2.6 vs. 3.1 g/m2), and the spike-decline pattern of the response were no different before and after starvation, respectively. Similarly, epinephrine-induced elevations in gluconeogenic precursors (lactate and alanine) were not altered by starvation. However, starvation accentuated the rise in FFA by 200%. We conclude that starvation does not diminish the rise in endogenous glucose production in response to stress-like elevations of epinephrine. This occurs even though the liver fails to respond to high physiological doses of glucagon, possibly because epinephrine enhances the mobilization of gluconeogenic precursors and FFA. These data suggest that epinephrine is a potent stimulator of gluconeogenesis and may be more effective than glucagon in accelerating glucose production in patients with depleted glycogen stores.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society