help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lobo, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lobo, R. A.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 58, 925-929, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Differences in the ratio of bioactive to immunoreactive serum luteinizing hormone during vasomotor flushes and hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women

SP Chang, D Shoupe, OA Kletzky and RA Lobo

With the recognition of differences between serum bioactive (bio) and immunoreactive (i) LH concentrations in various clinical situations, we measured changes in the bio:i LH ratio in postmenopausal (PM) women in response to iv GnRH, during the vasomotor flush, and in response to both estrogen and progestin treatment. Bio LH was measured using the mouse interstitial cell assay and LER 907 as standard, with conversion to milliinternational units per ml (Second International Reference Preparation of human menopausal gonadotropin). In 22 PM women, aged 42- 56 yr, serum bio LH [455 +/- 73 (+/- SE) mIU/ml] and the bio:i LH ratio (8.3 +/- 0.7) were significantly higher than in premenopausal women (25.5 +/- 5 mIU/ml and 1.5 +/- 0.2, respectively; P less than 0.002). In response to 150 micrograms iv GnRH, there was a greater rise in levels of iLH and bioLH in PM women than in premenopausal women, but there were no changes in the bio:i LH ratio after GnRH. During nine flushing episodes in three women, documented by digital temperature and iLH pulses, there was a significant increase in the bio:i LH ratio (P less than 0.001). After treatment of seven PM women for 2 months with 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens and seven other PM women with 150 mg im depomedroxyprogesterone acetate, vasomotor symptoms decreased significantly. Serum iLH did not change after treatment, but bio:i LH ratios decreased significantly, and 7 of 14 women had levels in the premenopausal range. These data suggest that bioLH and the bio:i LH ratio correlate better than iLH with symptomatology in PM women.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society