help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Almeida, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Merriam, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Almeida, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Merriam, G. R.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 58, 309-312, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Potency and specificity of a growth hormone-releasing factor in a primate and in vitro

OF Almeida, HM Schulte, RS Rittmaster, GP Chrousos, DL Loriaux and GR Merriam

The potency and specificity of the 44-amino acid human pancreatic tumor GRF were tested in six adult female rhesus monkeys and in a perifusion system containing a suspension of rat pituicytes. In vivo, plasma GH levels were elevated in a dose-dependent fashion, with an ED50 of approximately 5 micrograms/kg, a value of the same order of magnitude as other hypothalamic releasing hormones. The magnitude of the GH response after GRF treatment was similar to that observed during insulin-induced hypoglycemia, with peak plasma GH concentrations occurring 5-15 min after GRF administration. High doses of GRF slightly stimulated PRL release, but had no effect on arterial blood pressure, heart rate, or plasma cortisol or glucose concentrations. In vitro, GRF released GH in a dose-dependent manner, but no PRL was released even at the highest GRF concentrations employed (100 nM). It thus appears that stimulation of PRL in vivo may be an indirect effect of GRF. Alternatively, there may be species differences in responsiveness to GRF.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society