help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*LEVOTHYROXINE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Vision Impairment and Blindness

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 57, 283-287, Copyright © 1983 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Visual field defects and pituitary enlargement in primary hypothyroidism

K Yamamoto, K Saito, T Takai, M Naito and S Yoshida

In 14 patients with overt primary hypothyroidism, we examined visual fields by Goldmann's isopter perimetry. An unexpectedly high incidence (10 patients, 71.4%) of visual field defects was found. Two patients complained of visual failure, whereas 12 had no subjective symptoms. The extent of visual field change varied over a wide range, from early chiasmal compression to apparent bitemporal hemianopsia. The abnormality was characteristically restriction in the central visual field; peripheral vision was less often affected. The sella turcica was significantly enlarged in these patients as compared to controls. The volume of the sella turcica correlated significantly with both basal serum TSH and total pituitary reserve of TSH (r = 0.82, P less than 0.001). There was no correlation between the extent of visual field change and the volume of the sella turcica or pituitary TSH reserve. Of 10 patients with visual field defects, 8 improved during 1-4 months of T4 replacement. In 2 patients, however, the visual field defect deteriorated during replacement. The deterioration occurred when serum TSH levels had decreased to about 50% and 20% of pretreatment values, respectively. The peak serum TSH after TRH stimulation was higher at the time of deterioration than before treatment. Visual fields became normal during treatment with an increased dose of T4 (200 micrograms/day), when serum TSH was suppressed to an undetectable level. The paradoxical course of visual failure during T4 replacement may be due to an imbalance between TSH synthesis in the pituitary and TSH release which may induce an increase in pituitary size. The data suggest that visual field defects and their deterioration are due to pituitary hyperplasia and are reversible with T4 replacement. In order to rule out a pituitary tumor, hypothyroid patients with visual failure should be followed during T4 replacement therapy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. J. Sarlis, F. Brucker-Davis, J. L. Doppman, and M. C. Skarulis
MRI-Demonstrable Regression of a Pituitary Mass in a Case of Primary Hypothyroidism after a Week of Acute Thyroid Hormone Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 1997; 82(3): 808 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1983 by The Endocrine Society