help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Hormones

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 56, 1338-1340, Copyright © 1983 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Plasma lipotropin increase in man after growth hormone administration. Comparison between extractive and biosynthetic hormones

JM Kuhn, X Bertagna, D Seurin, M Gourmelen and F Girard

The action of human growth hormone (hGH) on plasma lipotropins (beta- and gamma-LPH) in 15 GH deficient patients was studied by comparing the effects induced by the acute administration of the extracted and biosynthetic molecules. The purified extracted preparation (6 mg/m2 im) induced a dramatic rise in plasma LPH: basal (49 +/- 12 pg/ml (mean +/- SEM); peak 1,658 +/- 262 pg/ml. The same dose of biosynthetic methionyl- hGH (met-hGH) induced no significant change in plasma LPH. Both preparations caused identical plasma GH increases. Six different commercially available extracted hGH preparations (Choay, France; Serono, Italy; France Hypophyse, France; Kabi, Sweden; Nordisk, Denmark; International Standard, Great Britain) all showed definite cross-reactivity in the LPH radioimmunoasay, varying from 0.1 to 1.0%, on a weight basis. No cross reactivity was found with met-hGH (less than 0.0001%). On gel exclusion chromatography, the LPH immunoreactivity of the purified preparations was dissociated from the GH immunoreactivity and eluted at the position of beta-and gamma-LPH. These data show that extracted hGH preparations are all contaminated with LPH and raise the question of the possible consequences of chronically elevated plasma LPH in treated patients. The use of biosynthetic met-hGH should prevent this occurence.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1983 by The Endocrine Society