help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 56, No. 5 1042-1047
doi:10.1210/jcem-56-5-1042
Copyright © 1983 by the Endocrine Society.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Vallotton, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Vallotton, M. B.

The Renin-Angiotensin System in Panhypopituitarism: Dynamic Studies and Therapeutic Effects in Sheehan's Syndrome*

Fawzi Bakiri, Moulay Benmiloud and Michel B. Vallotton

Service d'Endocrinologie (F.B., M.B.), Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; and Division d'Endocrinologie (M.V.), Hopital Cantonal Universitaire, Geneva, Switzerland

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. F. Bakiri, Service d'Endocrinologie, Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Hopital Mustapha, Algiers, Algeria.

To gain insight in the influence of the pituitary gland on the renin-angiotensin system plasma renin substrate (PRS) and the response of PRA to stimulation were studied in a homogenous group of 20 female patients with the same etiology and degree of pituitary failure, before treatment (group P), after hydrocortisone substitution (group F), and after hydrocortisone and thyroid hormone treatment (group F + T).

All patients were studied before and after each treatment by response to two stimulatory tests, acting through two different pathways; orthostasis test (O–T) and the furosemide test (Furo-T). Results were compared between groups, each patient serving as her own control, and with those obtained in a 12 healthy women control group (group C). The diet contained about 85 meq Na/day.

Compared to group C (O–T response, 5.97 ± 0.54 ng ml–1 h–1; Furo-T response, 6.71 ± 0.82 ng ml–1 h–1; mean ± SEM), PRA response to both tests was blunted in group P (O–T: 2.48 ± 0.46, P < 0.001; Furo-T: 3.02 ± 0.53, P < 0.001) and remained so in F (O–T: 2.18 ± 0.40, P < 0.001; Furo-T: 2.52 ± 0.28, P < 0.001). In group F + T, the response to both tests was greater than in P and F (O–T, 6.61 ± 1.19; Furo-T, 4.36 ± 0.44; 0.001 < P < 0.05). However, whereas the response to orthostasis is entirely normalized, the response to a diuretic remained significantly smaller than in group C (P < 0.01). These improvements were observed without significant change in PRS concentration which remained low.

We conclude that panhypopituitarism is accompanied by an altered renin angiotensin system. Basal levels of PRS and PRA are low and unresponsive to adequate stimulation. Whereas glucocorticoid therapy alone is without effect on this hyporeninism, addition of thyroid hormones completely normalized the response to orthostasis and significantly improved furosemide response. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56: 1042,1983)

* This work was supported by the Algerian National Organization for Scientific Research (Grant 75 A 1401) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 3.978.080).

Received June 2, 1982.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1983 by The Endocrine Society