help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolf, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Feibel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woolf, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Feibel, J.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 56, 246-250, Copyright © 1983 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Evaluation of the dopamine response to stress in man

PD Woolf, ES Akowuah, L Lee, M Kelly and J Feibel

Because the role of circulating dopamine (DA) in the sympathetic nervous system response to stress remains unclear, alterations in peripheral DA concentrations were determined in healthy volunteers after assuming upright posture (n = 6), hand immersion in ice water (cold pressor, n = 6), and insulin-induced hypoglycemia (n = 11) and in 17 comatose patients with severe brain injury (11 head trauma and 6 intracranial hemorrhage). Changes in DA levels were compared to increases in epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE), all of which were measured by the radioenzymatic technique. The minimum sensitivities were 42, 22, and 38 pg/ml, respectively. In 19 normal men and 22 women, basal DA levels were below assay sensitivity in 31 and were 85 +/- 7 (+/- SE) pg/ml in the remainder. Plasma E was measurable in all but 7 subjects, with a mean concentration of 41 +/- 4 pg/ml. NE levels were 201 +/- 17 pg/ml in 30 of the 31 subjects in whom it was detectable. There was no sex difference for any of the catecholamines. Upon standing, neither DA nor E changed significantly, but NE, increased by 176 +/- 40 pg/ml (P less than 0.0025). There were no significant changes in DA or E concentrations during the cold pressor test, while NE increased by 212 +/- 66 pg/ml (P less than 0.025). Compared to the E (1044 +/- 356 pg/ml; P less than 0.02) and NE (233 +/- 62 pg/ml; P less than 0.005) increments after hypoglycemia, the maximal DA increment, although significant (62 +/- 22 pg/ml; P less than 0.025), was less than those of the other catecholamines. DA levels were measurable in only 7 of 40 samples from 17 brain-injured patients and was 72 +/- 13 pg/ml in the remainder. However, E and NE levels were detectable in 79% of the samples and were significantly greater than normal (125.6 +/- 14 and 594 +/- 59 pg/ml; P less than 0.001, respectively). It is concluded that basal DA levels are generally below the assay limits of detectability. Furthermore, measurement of circulating levels suggests that DA participates in the general sympathetic response only when the adrenal component is maximally activated.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1983 by The Endocrine Society