help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyden, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyden, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 54, 711-714, Copyright © 1982 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Prolactin responses, menstrual cycles, and body composition of women runners

TW Boyden, RW Pamenter, D Grosso, P Stanforth, T Rotkis and JH Wilmore

Fourteen young women with normal menses participated in an endurance running program to investigate the effects of physical training on menstrual function, plasma PRL, and body composition. Body composition, measured by hydrostatic weighing, and PRL (basal and TRH-stimulated ) were determined initially and after each subject had increased her weekly mileage by 30 miles (delta 30) and 50 miles (delta 50). Mean (+/- SEM) total body weight did not change, but the subjects became significantly leaner (relative fat, 25.5 +/- 1.3% at baseline vs. 22.4 +/- 0.9% at delta 50; P less than 0.02). Thirteen women developed menstrual changes (mainly oligomenorrhea), but not amenorrhea. Mean (+/- SEM) unstimulated PRL levels were 16.8 +/- 3.1%, 16.9 +/- 2.4, and 11.5 +/- 2.1 ng/ml at baseline, delta 30, and delta 50, respectively (P less than 0.03 at delta 50 compared to baseline and delta 30). Mean ( +/- SEM) integrated TRH-stimulated PRL responses increased from 5002 +/- 462 ng/ml.min at baseline to 5748 +/- 609 mg/ml.min at delta 30 and 6535 +/- 552 ng/ml.min at delta 50, and were significantly different from one another (F = 4.01; P less than 0.04). Endurance training, without total body weight loss or extreme leanness, results in frequent menstrual dysfunction. Other authors have shown that young female athletes have an increased PRL response to acute exercise compared to nonathletes. One mechanism responsible for menstrual dysfunction in endurance-trained women may be frequent and exaggerated PRL responses to exercise and other stimuli.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Tworoger, B. Sorensen, J. Chubak, M. Irwin, F. Z. Stanczyk, C. M. Ulrich, J. Potter, and A. McTiernan
Effect of a 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial of Exercise on Serum Prolactin Concentrations in Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 895 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Dagogo-Jack, N. Al-Ali, and M. Qurttom
Augmentation of Bone Mineral Density in Hirsute Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1997; 82(9): 2821 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1982 by The Endocrine Society