help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merriam, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lipsett, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merriam, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lipsett, M. B.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 53, 784-789, Copyright © 1981 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Effects of catechol estrogen infusions upon gonadotropin and prolactin concentrations in men

GR Merriam, S Kono, HR Keiser, DL Loriaux and MB Lipsett

To study the effects of catechol estrogens upon gonadotropin secretion, 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) and 2-hydroxyestradiol (2-OHE2) were administered iv to young adult men in a range of doses for 4 days. Blood samples were obtained for plasma LH, FSH, and PRL at 20-min intervals for 6 h before and at the end of the infusion period. 2-OHE1 had no effect upon gonadotropins or PRL in doses up to 1.6 mg/day; at 3.2 and 6.6 mg/day, it produced a slight suppression of LH and FSH, with no change in PRL. 2-OHE2 was generally ineffective at 100 micrograms/day, but doses from 200-800 micrograms/day suppressed gonadotropins, without changes in PRL. These infusions elevated 2-OHE1 and 2-OHE2 plasma levels to values comparable to those measured in late pregnancy. There were no associated effects upon blood pressure and only minimal changes in urinary catecholamine excretion. No effects that could be interpreted as antiestrogenic were observed. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that circulating catechol estrogens behave as weak estrogens in men.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Carl De Cree, P. Ball, B. Seidlitz, G. Van Kranenburg, P. Geurten, and H. A. Keizer
Responses of Catecholestrogen Metabolism to Acute Graded Exercise in Normal Menstruating Women before and after Training
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1997; 82(10): 3342 - 3348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1981 by The Endocrine Society