help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elahi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Andres, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elahi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Andres, R.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 52, 1199-1203, Copyright © 1981 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Discrepant performance on oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests: the role of gastric inhibitory polypeptide

D Elahi, DK Andersen, JD Tobin and R Andres

Analysis of a large study population revealed a group of eight healthy men whose tolerance to oral glucose was markedly greater than their tolerance to iv glucose (disparate group). The physiological basis of the anomalous performance was investigated using a variation of the hyperglycemic glucose clamp technique. This technique allows separation of the effects of hyperglycemia and intestinal insulinotropic factors on B-cell response. The eight subjects with disparate tolerance tests were compared to eight healthy control subjects whose tolerances on the two tests were very similar. The disparate performers showed 1) higher basal circulating gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) levels, 2) lower immunoreactive insulin (IRI) responses to hyperglycemia (iv glucose alone), 3) enhanced GIP response to oral glucose, and 4) enhanced IRI response to oral glucose. These results may be interpreted as indicating a role for GIP in the improved tolerance for oral glucose, although other unknown gastrointestinal hormones could theoretically also be involved. Enhanced release of GIP after oral glucose may compensate for the reduced IRI release in response to hyperglycemia. The mechanism underlying the enhanced GIP response in these studies remains to be explored. It will be of interest to follow these subjects to see whether their anomalous gut beta-cell balance has any long term pathogenetic implications.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1981 by The Endocrine Society