help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howie, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howie, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, M.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 50, 670-673, Copyright © 1980 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The relationship between suckling-induced prolactin response and lactogenesis

PW Howie, AS McNeilly, T McArdle, L Smart and M Houston

The PRL response to suckling was studied during the first week of the puerperium. Mean basal levels of PRL showed no significant changing during the first week of the puerperium, but there were progressive rises in both the maximum suckling-induced response and the total area under the response curve, which reached peak values on the fourth day after delivery. Despite large variations between individuals in basal PRL levels (range, 0.3-7.0 U/liter), peak suckling-induced response (range, 0.1-9.9 U/liter), and total response (range, 0.6-63.0 arbitrary units), there was much less variability within individuals between consecutive feeds. Using an electronic balance, 20 patients on days 5 and 6 were classified either as good feeders (greater than 60 g milk/feed) or poor feeders (less than or equal to 60 g milk/feed) on the basis of 2 consecutive test weights. The mean PRL response to suckling in 11 good feeders was no different from that in 9 poor feeders, and there was no significant correlation between milk yield and PRL response. Six patients whose infants were in the special care nursery had lactation initiated and maintained by breast pump for an average of 5.6 days. Although the PRL response to the breast pump was very small, these patients also had satisfactory milk yields (mean, 86 g). Although the presence of PRL is essential for lactation, the data in this paper suggest that there is no close temporal correlation between PRL concentrations and milk yield.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. A. Mennella, M. Y. Pepino, and K. L. Teff
Acute Alcohol Consumption Disrupts the Hormonal Milieu of Lactating Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 1979 - 1985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. M. Rasmussen and C. L. Kjolhede
Prepregnant Overweight and Obesity Diminish the Prolactin Response to Suckling in the First Week Postpartum
Pediatrics, May 1, 2004; 113(5): e465 - e471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
P. D. Hill, R. T. Chatterton Jr., and J. C. Aldag
Serum Prolactin in Breastfeeding: State of the Science
Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 1999; 1(1): 65 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
J. De Coopman
Breastfeeding After Pituitary Resection: Support for a Theory of Autocrine Control of Milk Supply?
J Hum Lact, March 1, 1993; 9(1): 35 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1980 by The Endocrine Society