help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marx, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marx, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. L.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 50, 546-548, Copyright © 1980 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate response to parathyroid hormone: familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia versus typical primary hyperparathyroidism

SJ Marx, AM Spiegel, ME Sharp, EM Brown, DG Gardner, RW Downs Jr, MF Attie and JL Stock

We investigated cAMP metabolism during and after a 15-min infusion of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in 7 normals, 13 patients with typical primary hyperparathyroidism (1HPT), and 6 patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH). Nephrogenous urinary cAMP excretion rate reached a peak during the first or second 30 min urine collection interval after the start of the PTH infusion in all subjects. cAMP concentration in plasma reached a peak within 5--20 min of the start of the infusion and then decreased with an initial half-time of 15 min. The peak value of nephrogenous urinary cAMP excretion rate was lower in the group with 1HPT than in the group with FHH or in normals (119 vs, 275 vs. 204 nmol/100 ml glomerular filtrate; P less than 0.0 5 for both comparisons). Similarly, the peak value of plasma cAMP concentration was less in 1HPT subjects than in FHH patients or in normals (11.1 vs. 17.1 vs. 16.6 nmol/100 ml, respectively; P less than 0.05 for both comparisons). For purposes of diagnostic classification, the two hypercalcemia groups could be more completely separated by the values of either the renal calcium to creatinine clearance ratio or the plasma PTH concentration than by the values of inidices of cAMP response to PTH. The differences in cAMP response to PTH between FHH and 1HPT patients could be secondary to differences in circulating PTH concentrations (these are lower in subjects with FHH) or could reflect a renal lesion more closely related to the underlying etiology of FHH.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1980 by The Endocrine Society