help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thorner, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thorner, M. O.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 50, 103-107, Copyright © 1980 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Dopaminergic mechanisms and luteinizing hormone secretion. I. Acute administration of the dopamine agonist bromocriptine does not inhibit luteinizing hormone release in hyperprolactinemic women

WS Evans, AD Rogol, RM MacLeod and MO Thorner

The concept that domapinergic mechanisms control LH secretion by modulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) has been recently investigated in man. Since hyperprolactinemia is associated with increased hypothalamic dopamine turnover (which may reflect increased dopaminergic activity), inhibition of GnRH by dopamine in this situation would be maximal. Additional stimulation of dopamine receptors by a dopamine agonist would not be expected to result in further inhibition of LH release. Twelve hyperprolactinemic women were studied on 2 days during which measurements of serum PRL and LH were made over 11.5 h. Day 1 served as a control for day 2 when 2.5 mg of the dopamine agonist bromocriptine were administered orally at 0900 h. While serum PRL and LH levels on day 1 showed small fluctuations (+/- 10%), serum PRL on day 2 fell by 82%. Serum LH concentrations on day 2 remained unchanged. The demonstration or the efficacy of bromocriptine in lowering PRL levels documents the expected increase in dopaminergic tone; however, the lack of effect of bromocriptine in surpressing LH release suggests that either there is already maximal endogenous inhibition of GnRH in hyperprolactinemic women or, alternatively, that dopaminergic mechanisms are unimportant in the control of LH secretion.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1980 by The Endocrine Society