help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by L'Hermite, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robyn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by L'Hermite, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robyn, C.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 47, 1132-1136, Copyright © 1978 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Alteration of feedback mechanism of estrogen on gonadotropin by sulpiride-induced hyperprolactinemia

M L'Hermite, J Delogne-Desnoeck, A Michaux-Duchene and C Robyn

Four normally cycling women received an iv injection of 20 mg Premarin (conjugated estrogens equivalent to 20 mg estrone sulfate) on the seventh day of two consecutive cycles; the second experiment was performed under sulpiride-induced hyperprolactinemia (mean PRL level = 906 microU MRC standard 71/222 per ml; significantly 7.8 times greater than mean control level of 115 microU MRC standard 71/222 per ml, P less than 0.001). In comparison to the control experiment, sulpiride- induced hyperprolactinemia prevented the occurrence of any gonadotropin peak within the 84 h of estrogen administration; the negative feedback effect of estrogen on gonadotropin secretion was maintained and was even potentiated. These alterations of feedback mechanisms of estrogen were considered to be related to hyperprolactinemia itself rather than to sulpiride. Five other normally cycling women received iv injections of 100 microgram LRH on the 22nd day of a cycle under sulpiride-induced hyperprolactinemia since the onset of menstruation. Their mean LH response was somewhat greater (although not statistically significant) and their mean FSH response was considerably greater (P less than 0.001 at all times) than those of a control group of 10 women tested in their luteal phase. The results of these LRH tests under sulpiride-induced hyperprolactinemia give some support to the concept that hyperprolactinemia interferes at the hypothalamic or higher level with cyclic release of indogenous LRH.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1978 by The Endocrine Society