help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santner, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Santen, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santner, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Santen, R. J.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 44, 313-321, Copyright © 1977 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Usefulness of urinary gonadotropin measurements to assess luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LRF) responsiveness in hypogonadotropic states

SJ Santner, HE Kulin and RJ Santen

Multiple blood sampling techniques and short-term, timed urine collections were employed before and after luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LRF) administration to 51 individuals on 58 occasions. Correlation of blood and urine per cent responses to LRF were significant for LH (P less than .05) and FSH (P less than .001), indicating that urine measurements provide an adequate means of assessing response to LRF. In 7 patients with basal blood gonadotropin levels below assay sensitivity, urine measurements provided the only means of accurately determining a response to LRF. Per cent response to LRF was negatively correlated with basal LH levels in the urine (P less than .02) but not in the blood. A significant negative correlation between basal levels and per cent response was demonstrated for FSH in blood and urine (P less than .01). Accurate measurement of basal gonadotropins and the expression of LRF responses as per cent increments aided in distinguishing between patients with hypothalamic and pituitary diseases. A marked response to LRF in the presence of very low basal LH levels was found in patients with hypothalamic disorders, a finding revealed only by using urine determinations. Low per cent responses to LRF were seen primarily in patients with pituitary disease, a situation most clearly delineated by blood FSH measurements.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1977 by The Endocrine Society