help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiter, E. O.
Right arrow Articles by Duckett, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiter, E. O.
Right arrow Articles by Duckett, G. E.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 43, 400-411, Copyright © 1976 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

The response of pituitary gonadotropes to a constant infusion of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) in normal prepubertal and pubertal children and in children with abnormalities of sexual development

EO Reiter, AW Root and GE Duckett

The pattern of LHRH-evoked release of LH and FSH by pituitary gonadotrophs and the concomitant gonadal steroid secretion were studied in 28 pubertal and 16 prepubertal children. LHRH was administered at doses of 100 mug and 10 mug by a constant-infusion pump over 3 hours following a 2-hour control period. Gonadotropin concentrations were measured at 15-minutes intervals. Mean LH concentrations rose from 2.0 +/- 0.4 (SE) mIU/ml (IRP-2-hMG) to 6.2 +/- 0.9 (P less than .001) in normal prepubertal and from 5.8 +/- 0.9 to 28.0 +/- 3.6 (P less than .001) in normal pubertal children. The peak rise of LH, the mean level attained during the LHRH infusion, and the area under the time-response curve were greater (P less than .001) in pubertal than prepubertal children. The serum LH rise had two components in pubertal children in contrast to a single-phased increase in prepubertal children. Pulsatile release of LH was demonstrated during the basal period in pubertal children and during the LHRH infusion in both groups. FSH release was greater in girls than boys at both stages of pubertal development. A 10 mug LHRH infusion released less LH than did 100 mug in the pubertal children, but more than in prepubertal children. In pubertal boys, plasma testosterone rose (P less than .001) from 222 +/- 45 ng/dl in the control period to 301 +/- 59 following 100 mug LHRH. There was no change in plasma testosterone in the prepubertal boys after 100 mug LHRH or in the pubertal boys following 10 mug LHRH. Plasma estradiol did not rise in girls of either maturity group. In children with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and structural abnormalities of the hypothalamic-pituitary region, there was no LHRH-evoked gonadotropin release. In 2 agonadal girls, the secretion of LH and FSH was greatly exaggerated. The 3-hour LHRH infusion evoked a maturity-related pituitary LH release and a sex-specific FSH release; a 2-phased pattern of LH secretion was present in pubertal but not in prepubertal children; pulsatile LH release was evoked by the LHRH infusion in prepubertal children.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1976 by The Endocrine Society