help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seppala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laatikainen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seppala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laatikainen, T.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 43, 198-200, Copyright © 1976 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Prolactin and testosterone: independent circulating levels in hyperprolactinemic and normoprolactinemic amenorrhea. The effect of prolactin suppression by bromocriptine

M Seppala, E Hirvonen, HA Unnerus, T Ranta and T Laatikainen

In order to elucidate the pituitary regulation of the female testosterone secretion, we studied by radioimmunoassay the circulating prolactin (PRL) and testosterone-dihydrotestosterone (T-dT) levels in 12 hyperprolactinemic and 12 normoprolactinemic patients with secondary amenorrhea. After the basal levels had been recorded, each patient was given bromocriptine for two weeks, 2.5 mg twice daily, and repeat estimations of the PRL and T-dT levels were done. We found no significant difference in the basal T-dT levels between normoprolactinemic and hyperprolactinemic patients, and no significant correlation between the PRL and T-dT levels in either group. Although the PRL levels of the hyperprolactinemic patients were greatly suppressed by bromocriptine, the T-dT levels showed no systematic change. In normoprolactinemic patients, the T-dT concentrations were somewhat lower during bromocriptine treatment, but the difference from basal levels was not statistically significant (0.05 less than P less than 0.1). Our results suggest that in patients with secondary amenorrhea PRL does not interfere directly with T-dT secretion, or vice versa.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1976 by The Endocrine Society