help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM ENDO 08
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, R. B.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 42, 432-442, Copyright © 1976 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Strength-duration characteristics of estrogen effects on gonadotropin response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in women. II. Effects of varying concentrations of estradiol

JR Young and RB Jaffe

This study was designed to investigate the effect of varying concentrations of estradiol, administered to normal women, upon the gonadotropin response to synthetic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH or LRF). Beginning at 4 pm on the first day of the menstrual cycle, 19 studies were performed in subjects who received injections of estradiol benzoate (E2B every 12 h for 6 days). Concentrations of E2B administered (mug/kg/12 h) were: 0.3, 0.6, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, and 5.0. Mean serum estradiol concentrations achieved at these respective concentrations of E2B were 43, 53, 91, 145, 195, and 305 pg/ml. Twelve h after the last E2B injection, an intravenous bolus of 100 mug GnRH was administered. Gonadotropin response to this dose of GnRH after E2B was compared with each subject's response in the early follicular phase of a previous (control) cycle during which no exogenous estradiol was administered.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
I. E. Messinis
Ovarian feedback, mechanism of action and possible clinical implications
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 557 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. Weiss, J. H. Skurnick, L. T. Goldsmith, N. F. Santoro, and S. J. Park
Menopause and Hypothalamic-Pituitary Sensitivity to Estrogen
JAMA, December 22, 2004; 292(24): 2991 - 2996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. E. Messinis, S. Milingos, E. Alexandris, I. Mademtzis, G. Kollios, and K. Seferiadis
Evidence of differential control of FSH and LH responses to GnRH by ovarian steroids in the luteal phase of the cycle
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 299 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1976 by The Endocrine Society